The question of whether presidents should be granted immunity from legal liability is a complex one. Advocates for immunity argue that it is crucial to allow presidents to fully perform their duties without the constant threat of legal challenges. They contend that immunity safeguards against unfounded claims and prevents distractions on governing.

The concept of immunity has always been intriguing. A robust immune system is often seen as a indicator of strength and well-being. But could immunity be more than just a natural safeguard? Could it, in fact, become a means to influence power dynamics within communities? The potential for immunity-based advantage is a serious issue Ethical que